April 19th, 2007
Beginnings
Somehow, this scene got gradually more depressing everytime I rewrote it, till the point that it has little to do with the way I first pictured it. (mostly a little exercise on silent frames, but as you see, the sadistic narrator appeared and spoiled the future of the otherwise happy new couple…) Who knows, maybe there’ll be a sequel to this that proof that the smartass is wrong after all.
Next week, a new comic.
April 20th, 2007 at 11:30 pm
…”Amor vencido”/ Una Muñeca Rusa/ Adolfo Bioy Casares…el mismo patron de viñeta ausente: the same Sunday.
April 21st, 2007 at 3:35 pm
Es verdad, es verdad.
Un abrazo para tà con cariño (y gratitud)
April 22nd, 2007 at 1:25 pm
I hope so.
April 22nd, 2007 at 10:10 pm
Me alegra que hayan comentaristas que señalen intertextualidades
April 24th, 2007 at 10:46 am
Very nice, Juan Santapau, you make me proud every day I read this. I especially like the way the candle migrates in each panel.
April 24th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
Enjoying the continuity issues, huh?
April 25th, 2007 at 5:08 pm
Yes, because for people with OCD, it brings the focus on the candle, and you begin to realize why it is significant. You could create so much on the theory of why the candle is moving.
April 26th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
I hope the same thing too. I hope the sequel got a happy ending, not only to prove to the narrator he was wrong, but to see another end, one that doesn’t match with reality.
Excelent work, as always. I’m already expecting the next one!.
Parchesians Greetings!.
April 28th, 2007 at 11:24 am
The idiom is “to make sense”, not “to have sense”.
April 28th, 2007 at 9:12 pm
Right. Gracias.
May 8th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
So good it hurts.